Home » Editorial » The dumb distribution of Abacha loot
Editorial

The dumb distribution of Abacha loot

The dumb distribution of Abacha loot - Abacha

Against the objections of the National As­sembly and wise counsel of civil society or­ganisations, the federal government may this month begin the sharing of the $322 million (about N115.92 billion) loot recovered from the late dictator, Gen. Sani Abacha, and his family to the poorest people in the country if it keeps to its pledge. The loot was recovered from Switzerland which until recently had provided a safe haven for corrupt rulers like Abacha and his co-travelers to hide the common patrimony of their people illegally acquired.

Under the auspices of its National Social Safety Net Coordinating Office (NASSCO), N5,000 will be paid to 302,000 households in 19 of the 36 states of the federation through the federal government’s Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT) scheme – a wel­fare programme aimed at ameliorating poverty through the transfers of money to persons who meet certain undefined criteria. The wealth distribution programme, according to persons involved in the ex­ercise, is in consonance with the agreement reached with Swiss authorities that the recovered loot should be spent on social protection programmes in the country.

The exercise is coming despite the vehement oppo­sition of some CSOs which contended that the plan to share the loot among households is mere token­ism and would neither have a significant impact on poverty alleviation nor satisfy the twin objectives of justice and development. Warning the government against the move would have no significant impact on poverty alleviation, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP), for instance, stated that distributing N5,000 to households would neither improve the socio-economic conditions of beneficiaries nor achieve the enduring value of a more transparent and robust system to manage re­covered loot.

On its part, the National Assembly argued that the presidency ought not to embark on such agree­ment and spending without parliamentary approv­als. Other stakeholders, including opposition politi­cal parties are apprehensive that coming just ahead of the 2019 elections, the exercise lacks discernible parameters for determining poor households in an atmosphere where the country is yet to evolve a co­herent welfare programme. In fact, they pointedly accused the ruling party of using the opaque con­duct of the exercise to re-loot the recovered money.

The programme is a puzzling piece of social engi­neering. Recently, the US-based Brookings Institu­tion classified Nigeria as home to the largest num­ber of extremely poor people in the world well ahead of India. The classification is based on the fact that 86 million of Nigeria’s about 190 million people live on less than $1.9 per day. This is the minimum in­come required by an individual to have a decent liv­ing daily, according to the United Nations. N5,000 amounts to about $14 which a “household” is expect­ed receive to alleviate poverty. If an individual, in this case 86 million Nigerians, are in extreme pov­erty for having access to less than $1.9 per day, how would sharing $14 to 302,000 “households” monthly “alleviate” poverty?

Wealth as in the management of businesses and affairs of nations is the source of creating wealth on which the living standard of the people are improved. $322 million is a lot of money that can substantially impact on the effectiveness of pro­grammes in health, agriculture as well as small and medium scale enterprises. Each has the capacity to improve a people’s living standard. Unfortunately, resorting to sharing the recovered loot at N5,000 per household is a short-sighted, visionless and dumb way of fighting extreme poverty.

Even if the federal government is given a benefit of doubt, the idea of executing the exercise in only 19 of the 36 states under any guise is insensitive, unfair and discriminatory. This is the more so given that majority of the 19 states – Niger, Kogi, Kwara, Bauchi Gombe, Jigawa, Benue, Taraba, Adamawa, Kano, Katsina, Kaduna, Plateau, Nasarawa, and Borno – are in the north while only five – Ekiti, Osun, Oyo, Cross River, Anambra – are southern states with south south and southeast regions having one state each. Unfortunately, such lopsidedness, even though avoidable, has been the hallmark of the Mu­hammadu Buhari administration.

However, the main issue is that the poverty allevi­ation plan to share the money is too pedestrian and dumb to have any modicum of effect on the quality of lives of the beneficiaries. We hereby urge the federal government to suspend the exercise immediately. If the government lacks ideas on how the huge sum can be utilised to create wealth, there is no dearth of Nigerians with the right and viable ideas. We urge the government to consult CSOs and agencies with rich experience on how limited funds when accessed by entrepreneurial Nigerians can empower the peo­ple to create wealth. That the Swiss government insisted on utlising the money directly to improve the living standard of the people is commendable and understandable. The problem is with the fed­eral government which adopted an unimaginative approach to interpreting the agreement.

On suspending the exercise, the administration should convert the money into a trust fund to be transparently managed and invested into tangible projects that would improve access of those living in poverty to essential public services such as wa­ter, education and health. It should also be used to provided sorely needed resources in driving the growth of SMEs. In the end, distributing N5,000 to household would neither improve the socio-econom­ic conditions of beneficiaries nor achieve the endur­ing value of a more transparent and robust system to manage recovered loot.

Tags

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

Social Media Connect

Orient Maiden

Orient Maiden
Name:
Nwada Ebere Ude
State:
Anambra State
Occupation:
Actress / Model
Contact:
08064563812