Home » Editorial » The Saraki, Ekweremadu phenomenon
Editorial Opinion

The Saraki, Ekweremadu phenomenon

The Saraki, Ekweremadu phenomenon -

By Law Mefor

“It is courage, courage, courage, that raises the blood of life to crimson splendor. Live bravely and present a brave front to adver­sity.”– Horace

Like Nelson Mandela said out of his own abhorrent persecu­tion, courage is not the absence of fear, but the triumph over it. In other words, the brave man is not he who does not feel afraid, but he who conquers that fear by confronting it.

The fascist clampdown on the Senate President and the Deputy, Senators Bukola Sara­ki and Ike Ekweremadu by the APC-led Federal Government just assumed the most absurd dimensions…crude and cruel, and even rascally. This time around, the desperation is to physically remove the irre­pressible duo from office, im­pose their replacements, and forestall the planned defection of about 2 dozen senators from the APC.

As simpletons the planners were rather than strategists, the hurriedly coupled idea hashed out two invitations to the two presiding officers of the Senate. That of Saraki was a reopening of the Offa robbery case, which failed to fly when the Police first tried it. He was given the invitation by 8 pm on Monday night and asked to report to SARS Abuja office by 8am the following day. Such marching order by the police to the head of an arm of govern­ment who would preside over the senate plenary the same day smacked of everything – insensitivity, contempt, desper­ation and disdain for the legis­lature and its leadership.

The invitation to Senator Ike Ekweremadu was even more ri­diculous, curious and reckless. Quite early the dark Tuesday, a detachment of the DSS with a sprinkling of EFCC opera­tives besieged his Apo Abuja residence, to block him from leaving and attending to the day’s senate plenary. As an af­terthought, an EFCC invitation letter, riddled with contradic­tions, was written and signed for Deputy Senate President the same 24th morning, to re­port to the ECC office in Wuse II in a matter of an hour or two.

Meanwhile, the street leading into the Deputy Senate Presi­dent’s residence was cordoned off end to end by about 200 secu­rity operatives and himself pre­vented from leaving the house. How then was he to honour the invitation assuming that was the actual intention? The illog­icality is as perplexing as it was nauseating…government by brigandage you dare say!

Senator Bukola Saraki man­aged to reach the National As­sembly on foot and presided over the Senate plenary. Ekw­eremadu could not.

The defining moment has brought the two men more into view as faces of Nigerian de­mocracy, as personifications of courage in adversity and men truly adept and sagacious in the Nigerian politics. Their mettle in the face of debilitat­ing danger has become a classic study in political courage at a time when most leaders in their ranks are cowering even from their own shadows.

READ ALSO  Reaping the gains of intellectual property

Democracy and democratic governance in the country have never come under greater ex­istential threats than in these appalling moments, where all democratic gains and even norms of civilized conducts are being reversed by govern­ment actions and inactions, and with unmatched impunity. One would often wonder what would have been the fate of the nation’s democracy and indeed that of the legislature if Sena­tor Saraki and Senator Ekwer­emadu were less mortals and politically less audacious.

It is about getting at the two leaders of National Assembly at all costs, to entertain some diseased fancied of some Par­ty chieftains and some des­peradoes in Government. A drowning man may catch at anything; that is why they are revisiting of the Offa bank rob­bery against Saraki, after the Supreme Court of Nigeria (May God bless and keep the elder statesmen and eminent jurists for demonstrating courage as well) had ruled that indeed his trial at the Code of Conduct Tribunal was a travesty of jus­tice. And of course, discerning minds have always known that the trial was politically moti­vated and never meant to serve any justice. The prosecutors knew this, and still vigorously pursued the case despite not having justice as goal.

The second case opened by the Attorney General added the Deputy Senate President, Sen Ike Ekweremadu, over allega­tion of forgery of senate rules to aide their emergence as presid­ing officers. The bogey forgery trial was based on a spurious police investigative report in which neither Senator Saraki nor Senator Ekweremadu was mentioned. They were charged nonetheless. Even without a shred of evidence or reasonable conjectures, the same reason the case was eventually thrown out by the Supreme Court. But not without embarrassing and humiliating the presiding offi­cers of the Senate and the Leg­islature.

While both innocent men who head of the legislative arm of government were forced to sit in the duck for the trumped up charges, it was actually the nation’s democracy and legis­lature that was on trial. The promoters were only reminding the world that Nigeria is not yet qualified to practice democ­racy or to be counted among civilized countries.

The claim of the Presidency that it is a good omen for every citizen to go through the rig­ors of trial and establishment of innocence is dishonest since the charges were never meant to be and only calculated to damage and condemn them in the court of public opinion and force them to vacate their seats as presiding officers.

READ ALSO  Promoting regular intake of clean water

This narrative gained much currency as curious strident calls for their resignation rent the air as soon as the orches­trated trials commenced. Those curious calls that rang out for the two to step down as “no 3” and “no5” citizens and face their trial at the tribunal and Federal High court, were well calculated. On the face value, the calls appeared innocuous and even patriotic, and could have been even apropos if their cases were not trumped up as they have turned out.

Those pushing for the resig­nation of the Senate President particularly tried to justify it by saying that the issue had reached a critical stage where Senator Saraki’s corruption tri­al was questioning the Senate’s integrity and harming Nigeria’s pride. For them, therefore, the Senate under Senator Saraki was fast losing credibility. Like an American Investor Rupert Murdoch had said; Look for three things in a Man: intelli­gence, energy and integrity, and if you cannot find the third, do not bother looking for the other two. It was an emotional black­mail that quickly caught up with many gullible Nigerians.

But question is: if Saraki and Ekweremadu had yielded to the malignant calls for resigna­tion on phony charges trumped up just to achieve same, could they have gotten back their positions back after the law courts had proved them inno­cent? The presumption of an accused innocence until guilt is duly proved in our jurisdiction is just apt.

Yet, in today’s APC’s Nige­ria, efforts are being exerted to presume the accused guilty until his or her innocence is proved. This explains why the anti-corruption agencies have preferred media trials to prop­er investigations. For this same reason, too, most high profile trials have woefully failed to end in convictions.

READ ALSO: Fayose a political blackmailer, pathological liar – APC

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

Social Media Connect